Let’s pretend… or, let me pretend… My rich uncle died and left me a fortune… Naah, that won’t work ’cause I only had three uncles and they all died thirty or more years ago, and I didn’t receive a plug nickel from any of ’em.
So, let’s say that I was a very smart entrepreneur who made millions and managed to save a couple of ’em. What would I do with such a stash? That won’t work either because I never was an entrepreneur! Well, my job, or calling, was the type where my “employers” MO was something like this: “God, you keep him humble and we’ll keep him poor!” So, that ain’t gonna work either!
Hey, I got it! Let me pretend that I won the lotto, the BIG one! Hmmm… that’d cost a couple bucks… just maybe that’s it!! Ah gosh, I’d have to be struck by lightening 6 times before I’d win, so they say. I might get killed! That’d be no fun at all!
So, let’s just pretend anyway… Pretend what?
That I’m going on safari to South Africa for elephant and Cape buffalo, plus some other stuff. Hey, that’s a great idea! But what rifle should I choose, and what cartridge?
Today we’re gonna compare my pet .458 Win Mag (in it’s CZ550 format) with the favorite of the nostalgic crowd… “Crowd”? Hardly! Well, let’s just say it’s far more popular that it’s rival we looked at last week, the .404 Jeffery!
The .416 Rigby, as disclosed a few weeks ago, has been the darling of a nostalgic bunch who think that by owning one they can somehow relive the experiences of the famed African PH, Harry Selby. Yes, I know that no writer of the past or present is going to put it in those stark terms. They have been, and are, more politically correct. It’s usually presented in a way that highlights it’s ballistic qualities. What do I mean?
On the forums, there seems to be a certain je ne sais quoi fascination with early 1900 British cartridges for African DG, and the .416 Rigby is out-pacing the others, such as the .577 N.E., by quite a distance. So, what’s the big deal? Well, it has become the darling of some writers like the late Jack O’Connor, and more recently Boddington and Barsness. Well, Boddington at least, though to be fair about it, he uses many different rifles on African fauna. But, he’s gone on record as liking the .416 Rigby very much while he makes ballistic distinctions between .416’s, .458’s and .577’s.
To be more politically incorrect… people–in this case rifle shooters–get jaded with their possessions. They want something new and different. When it comes to Big Bores, there are only so many in few calibers. There IS a current craze but it pales in comparison to the short-magnum craze of recent times in the .270 to .30-caliber class! Just what we need is another short-short WONDERWAMMER in .30-caliber “magume”, as one Italian gunshop owner was want to call his .300 magnum.
But all that is beside the point… which is that the .416 Rigby seems to be more and more the talked about magic for African DG. Ruger chambers it in their M77 MkII. That one seems quite popular for a Big Bore. As well, so does CZ in their 550 Magnum as well as CZ-USA in their Magnum Express Rifle. Then, it’s possible to have one custom built by some smaller enterprises as well as by your favorite ‘smith.
The cartridge-case is BIG. Dimensions in BARNES #4 is as follows: case length = 2.900″ and COL at 3.75″ max. That demands a full-length magnum action. Case capacity is nearly equal to the Weatherby .416. “Nearly”, that’s the operative word… just not quite.
According to GUNS&AMMO’s Complete Book of CARTRIDGES (2009), there are eight factory offerings, all 400-grainers except for one 410 load. The ballistics are traditional: ranging from a low of 2297 fps (400grn) to a high of 2440 fps (400grn). Nothing special or outstanding there.
As pointed out a few weeks ago, because of the size and volume of the case, it should nearly equal the .416 Weatherby ballistics, and this seems to be a boast among the cognoscente, but rarely do owners use it’s full potential, being content with what they say worked back in the day. That’s baffling! Why go to the bother of a longer, heavier, and usually more expensive rifle only to use 66% of it’s potential? Plus, ammo is scarce and EXPENSIVE! I’d MUCH prefer the .416 Ruger or Remington! Or, really, the Taylor! Why? Because the ballistics are the same and items are much handier and cheaper!
But, the real point of this series of blogs is to measure the .458 Win Mag up against other Big Bores, such as the .416 Rigby.
Since my .458 Winchester Magnum is the same basic rifle as CZ’s .416 Rigby, it’s a fairly straightforward matter of comparison. But we must use handloads, as factory loads in each are below par–for reasons that are a deep mystery to most handloaders.
First up, the .416 Rigby, and we’ll use the best loads right out of BARNES #4 manual because it gives the best data of all that I have on hand:
350grn TSX: SD=.289; BC=.345; best load=2615 fps from 104 grns powder (24″ barrel). K.E.=5314 ft-lbs.
350grn Banded Solid: SD=.289; BC=.364; best load=2706 fps from 107 grns powder (24″ barrel). K.E.=5690 ft-lbs.
400grn TSX: SD=.330; BC=.392; best load=2464 fps from 104grns powder (24″ barrel). K.E.=5392 ft-lbs.
400grn Banded Solid: SD=.330; BC=.388; best load=2580 fps from 109.5 grns powder (24″ barrel). K.E.=5912 ft-lbs.
NOW, the .458 Win Mag (all Barnes’ loads from 24″ barrel; my loads from 25″):
350 TSX: SD=.238; BC.278; best load=2753 fps from 80 grns powder; K.E.=5890 ft-lbs. (There is no 350 Banded, but a 330 Banded which I’ve not yet tried in my CZ).
450 TSX: SD=.306; BC=.369 (Barnes data at 3.34″–I can load it to 3.7″ in my CZ); Barnes=2242 fps/5022 ft-lbs from 73.5 grns powder. At 3.7″, about 2400 fps should be possible.
450 Banded: SD=.306; BC=.362 (Barnes data at 3.34″ =2385 fps best load from 79 grns powder/5683 ft-lbs. From my 25″ at 3.7″ COL 2450 fps/5997 should be quite possible.
500 Hornady: SD=.341; BC=.287 (Hornady data from 24″) best load=2200 fps. I can quite readily get 2260 fps at 3.34″/5670 ft-lbs.
Then, as pointed out last week: there are 550’s and 600’s(SD=.409; BC=.454– at 2150 fps and 2050 fps, respectively, which puts the .458 Win Mag out of reach to the .416 Rigby, or any other .416.
Just calculate the momentum and you’ll see what I mean: 600 X 2050 = 1,230,000 compared to 400 x 2600=1,040,000. Now I realize that Woodleigh makes a 450grn for the .416’s (as recently mentioned) and a 550 in .458″ as well. If we grant 2400 fps for the 450 in .416″ and 2150 fps for the 550 in .458″–both loads are reasonable–then do the math again: the .458 Win Mag would only need to push that 550grn out the end of the barrel at 1964 fps to make things equal in momentum. Their SD’s are similar so that’s not a factor in this comparison. The Rigby would have a slight advantage in kinetic energy but fall behind in momentum (which is more important in Big Bores) by about 10% as well as in a permanent wound channel due to 21% less cross-sectional area. I give the advantage to the .458 Win Mag again. Then, of course, there are 600grns available, and at 2050 fps with an SD of .409 compared to .372 in the .416/450grn, plus 14% more momentum, the .458 Winchester pulls away from the .416 Rigby.
I’ll stay with my CZ in .458 Winchester, thank you very much!
Coming up in our next blog: the .500 N.E. Can the .458WM hold on? Or, is it slipping behind? We’ll see…
Shalom
BOB MITCHELL